Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:47:15 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com, newlib@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: several more bugs found by coreutils
Message-ID: <20050208174715.GA22752@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com, newlib@sources.redhat.com
References: <020120052058.2301.41FFED5A000D5EEC000008FD22007614380A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net> <20050202100718.GA7767@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20050208174211.GA3178@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050208174211.GA3178@cygbert.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:42:11PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>I have attached a patch to newlib this time.  Thinking about that
>for a while, I'm pretty sure that it doesn't make sense to build
>old 32 bit versions of Cygwin with recent newlib versions.  So I'm
>opting for having a clean pwd.h.
>
>The below patch changes the definitions of struct passwd and utimes(2)
>according to SUSv3.

Cool.  I was wondering about that.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

