Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:38:06 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Hyperthreading problem: remote access
Message-ID: <20050201223806.GB8400@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <41FD7F9D.9060608@pulserate.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050130195041.05c31ec0@pop.prospeed.net> <41FFFC27.4000808@pulserate.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <41FFFC27.4000808@pulserate.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:01:11PM +0100, Joris van der Sande wrote:
>Larry Hall wrote:
>>Chris has already answered that question earlier in the discussion.  He
>>needs physical access to the machine to resolve this problem.  Remote
>>access isn't enough.
>
>Forgive my ignorance, but I read the archives back to 1 jan 2004 but
>found no explanation why remote access doesn't help the developers to
>track down the problem.  Could someone please point me to the relevant
>postings?

I can't imagine why this would be a useful thing to discuss here.
However, here is one of the times I repeated that I don't want to do
this over the internet:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2005-01/msg00521.html

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/