Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:36:58 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: problem in pthread_key_create Message-ID: <20050110203658.GK23702@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <200501101836.j0AIaG9m007168@thor.remedy.nl> <20050110191136.GI23702@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20050110201315.GJ23702@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Jan 10 15:23, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > By calling pthread_key_create more than once for the same key the > > regression test is doing something outside of the specs. I don't > > see how that is something else but a bug in the way pthread_key_create > > is invoked. > > Since it's a regression test, one could conceivably imagine them testing > that this kind of double invocation isn't allowed on the system, thus > making this pattern valid. This is a stretch, thus my "If not" prefix... > Igor Uh, yes, agreed. It would only be a bug in the regression test if this test is actually treated as "failed". That's what I assumed. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/