Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:54:04 -0800 From: David Hinds To: Cygwin List Subject: Re: A vexing installation problem Message-ID: <20041201185404.GA10032@sonic.net> References: <20041129195946.GA4932@sonic.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20041129151309.046bfba0@pop.prospeed.net> <20041129215220.GA15085@sonic.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20041129171109.046d1728@pop.prospeed.net> <20041129231740.GA32760@sonic.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20041129181904.046bf960@pop.prospeed.net> <20041130011421.GA20359@sonic.net> <20041130170757.GA3861@sonic.net> <20041130192952.GA2722@sonic.net> <20041201184434.GA7909@sonic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041201184434.GA7909@sonic.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:44:34AM -0800, David Hinds wrote: > Drat... Windows Update decided to install a "critical security fix" > last night, and today, Cygwin appears to be 100% dead in the water as > opposed to yesterday's 90%. The security fix is supposed to be in > Internet Explorer so it might just be a coincidence. I think it was just a coincidence. The rate of success does seem lower now, but I can't do an objective comparison. -- Dave -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/