Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: Upgraded man command Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:12:38 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Harig, Mark" To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id iAOHEfCD031245 > From: Christopher Faylor > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:57 AM > Subject: Re: Upgraded man command > > This seems like a good candidate for bugzilla: > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=cygwin > > The component for the bug would be "Cygwin Applications". > > -----Original Message----- > From: Igor Pechtchanski > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:06 PM > Subject: RE: Upgraded man command > > There's always the solution that base-files uses for replacing various > config files -- it checks whether the file is the same as the > default in > the preremove script, and erases it if so. Then the > postinstall script > copies the new default, and the config file is up-to-date. This won't > work if the users edited their config files, but should work in most > cases. OK. I will submit a bug report suggesting that /etc/preremove/base-files-manifest.lst be updated to include /usr/share/misc/man.conf. --- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/