Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:31:42 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: flex and dos source files.   How is flex built for cygwin
Message-ID: <20041120193142.GD2765@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <419E499B.4040007@mvista.com> <6.1.0.6.0.20041119143038.04e7a008@pop.prospeed.net> <419E52C1.6030604@mvista.com> <419E5922.9060501@mvista.com> <419EFB39.8020005@x-ray.at> <29A01F5A-3B11-11D9-84CE-000D932D0448@rehley.net> <419F8AA5.9040009@x-ray.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <419F8AA5.9040009@x-ray.at>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 07:19:17PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
>so cgf should repackage it. it's obviously a bug.

 From the description of the behavior of the released flex binary, it sounds
like it is working just fine.

If you are saying that I should repackage the source files because you
couldn't that the package was linked with automode.o then, that's
something which is very far down on my list of priorities.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/