Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:05:51 +0100 From: Owen Rees To: cygwin@cygwin.com, cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict (fixed in snapshot?) Message-ID: <6B2B3649592BD9BC9AED7CDF@REES-O-2.labs.hpl.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <20041011040641.GD5016@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> References: <4164ABA6.20205@gladstonefamily.net> <20041007034237.GE6359@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <41693BD6.4060304@gladstonefamily.net> <20041011024427.GC5016@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <4169FEEC.3060607@gladstonefamily.net> <20041011040641.GD5016@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com X-IsSubscribed: yes Note-from-DJ: This may be spam --On 11 October 2004 00:06 -0400 Christopher Faylor wrote: > So, I'd appreciate reports on the latest snapshot. Does it fix any > problems? Cause any problems? No change? I have XP Pro and Symantec AV - the 20041010 snapshot fixes the slowness I was having with emacs/X locally and X forwarded over SSH, and with no problems observed so far. The severe performance problems appeared some time in August IIRC, and my first impression is that the performance is now better than before the problems. Regards, Owen Rees Hewlett Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK tel: +44 117 312 9439 fax: +44 117 312 9153 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/