Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:00:53 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: File permission problem Message-ID: <20040924150053.GG12802@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <6334E09627481B4AA5C8DE1E69E19D3B013BA6ED@SSLEXCHANGE.solomonsystech.com> <4153DE28.EA0B2556@dessent.net> <20040924091513.GX12802@cygbert.vinschen.de> <4153EAB1.DF553825@dessent.net> <20040924094839.GZ12802@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20040924144931.GA674@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Sep 24 07:51, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 07:42:05AM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > > > >>I'm trying to understand why one would want ntsec on by default and > >>smbntsec off by default? > > > >smbntsec doesn't work reliably given the variability of smb servers. > > Still seems strange to me. If off it doesn't work at all (right?)! Even > if it worked 50% of the time that's 50% better than 0%. What's strange in having an unreliable option only switched on if the user really wants it and (hopefully) knows what (s)he's doing? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/