Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:45:30 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Release candidate: gcc-3.4.1-1 Message-ID: <20040828214530.GA31976@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <05d701c48ace$cddbb2c0$0e00a8c0@duli2> <961849581086.20040825202831@familiehaase.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <961849581086.20040825202831@familiehaase.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:28:31PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Krzysztof schrieb: > >> Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > >>> > Is this true? I have 3.3.1 libraries in /lib and >>> > /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.1, but 2.95 libraries only in >>> > /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-10. >>> >>> There was no libjava with 2.x compilers. There was no libobjc with 2.x >>> compilers. What about libstdc++? > >> As I said, 2.95 holds all its libraries, including libstdc++, in >> /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-10. > >Interesting, I would be interested why the previous maintainer switched >to unversioned runtime libs. The usual reason. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/