Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <412E136B.2060800@x-ray.at> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:44:27 +0200 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040714 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Why umount -A is a really bad idea References: <412CFBCB.3040808@breame.com> <20040825210724.GG29527@mikee.ath.cx> <412DC006.8090907@x-ray.at> <23bcb8700408260629433c7dbd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Igor Pechtchanski schrieb: > Or, perhaps, a better solution would be to implement a mount table a la > Unix, as CGF has been advocating for years. Any takers? you mean /etc/mtab <=> /proc/mounts and /etc/fstab. No, this looks like real work. And then we would really have to create the other device drivers. like usbdevfs, devpts, loopback, crypto, ext3, ... -- I'm using MozTweak addon, and you? MozTweak: http://www.MozillaPL.org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/