Subject: Re: Updated: gcc-3.3.3-3
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 01:27:46 +0200

Christopher writes:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:52:02PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase
>>> Sent: 20 August 2004 14:40
>>
>>> NEWS
>>> ====
>>> In this release the option '-fschedule-insns2' was disabled 
>>> for '-O2' or greater optimization 
>>
>>> The change (against 3.3.3-2 sources) for Cygwin builds looks 
>>> as follows:
>>> --- gcc-3.3.3-3-orig/gcc/toplev.c       2003-12-23 
>>> 07:28:29.000000000 +0100
>>> +++ gcc-3.3.3-3/gcc/toplev.c    2004-08-19 14:39:39.911977900 +0200
>>> @@ -4900,8 +4907,12 @@
>>>        flag_peephole2 = 1;
>>>  #ifdef INSN_SCHEDULING
>>>        flag_schedule_insns = 1;
>>> +#ifdef __CYGWIN__
>>> +      flag_schedule_insns_after_reload = 0;
>>> +#else
>>>        flag_schedule_insns_after_reload = 1;
>>>  #endif
>>> +#endif
>>>        flag_regmove = 1;
>>>        flag_strict_aliasing = 1;
>>>        flag_delete_null_pointer_checks = 1;
>>> 
>>> # END OF PATCH

>>  This sort of change is much better made in the specs on the whole.  Just
>>FYI.

> Yes, good point Dave.

> Ditto.

It is just a temporary fix.  I hope that we can drop it with 3.4.x.
I would be more interested if it helps to build cygserver.

Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/