Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:30:11 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Slashdot: cygwin in a Production Environment? Message-ID: <20040813133011.GC32180@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 12:20:50AM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: >I noticed that story on Slashdot - >http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/12/1932246 . May >be of interest for some people (or not). Interesting how some of the vaguely erroneous entries are modded up as "interesting" or "informative". Seems like at least some people think that somehow "Red Hat" has put its full corporate might behind cygwin, which is pretty funny. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/