Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:18:00 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: sending email from Cygwin
Message-ID: <20040715081800.GC19753@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <cd251o$t1e$1@sea.gmane.org> <20040714234445.ABA0C84C1E@pessard.research.canon.com.au> <20040715010020.GA296325@Worldnet> <cd4n7v$cf7$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cd4n7v$cf7$1@sea.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i

On Jul 15 01:39, Robert R Schneck wrote:
> Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> >Luke Kendall wrote:
> >> or that it creates a symlink to sendmail. 
> >
> > exim doesn't. That symlink is created by the cygwin specific exim-config
> > script under explicit user control. That avoids possible conflicts with
> > postinstall scripts.
> 
> Hmmm.  So perhaps the appropriate new behavior for ssmtp is to do the 
> same thing, asking the user whether to create such a link in the 
> ssmtp-config.  I think so.  Anyone else advise otherwise?

That's a good point.  Yes, I guess ssmtp-config should do that, the same
way as the exim-config script (perhaps you can just use Pierre's code.
Would that be ok, Pierre?).

I've prepared a cron package for upload with a postinstall script which
doesn't create the /usr/bin/sendmail symlink anymore.  I'll upload it
as soon as Robert has prepared a new ssmtp package for upload.  I've
also added a few words to /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/cron.README about the
dependency to /usr/bin/sendmail :-)

> Incidentally is it appropriate to include Cygwin-port-specific 
> information in a man page?

Well, from a user perspective it might be cool, but IMHO the original
man page shouldn't be changed, unless it's a change which should be
send upstream anyway.  We have the Cygwin specific documentation in
/usr/share/doc/Cygwin (resp. /usr/doc/Cygwin in earlier releases) for
a long time now.  It should be not too hard to ask users to look there
for Cygwin specific docs.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Co-Project Leader          mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

