Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 17:05:01 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?") Message-ID: <20040709210501.GD6306@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <013301c464fe$e2e425d0$4e6510ac@ds.tao.co.uk> <00aa01c4659f$662717e0$4e6510ac@ds.tao.co.uk> <20040709153850.GE3525@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20040709163809.GB5602@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20040709182238.GB6306@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:37:10AM -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote: >*** Christopher Faylor (ufocgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com.tv)...: > >If I make this research, you do the change in the way the archives are >generated, so that all people in this thread be happy. Do we have a >deal? Here's how it works: You do the research yourself, then you present your case where I have previously stated. My participation is not required. There are others who know about this and anyone who does reads the overseers mailing list. I do not want to be involved in doing this. I do not have the right to unilaterally change the mail archiving software on sourceware.org. I am not going to be your champion for this policy change for this site. >:) >>OTOH, if anyone wants to change the policy of sourceware.org, you are >:) >>welcome to send email to the overseers mailing list and lobby for >:) >>change. I don't think you are going to find a receptive audience, >:) >>but I could be wrong. >:) > >:) >I don't think it's the time to send such request. I will wait a couple >:) >of years to do so. >:) >:) Then you are done with this discussion except as a theoretical exercise, >:) apparently. > >I did not say so. You are very good to "infer" INCORRECT opinions out >loud. You SHOULD not. This is not a theoretical exercise, you can do >something about it that I can not. If I am the only one with the power, then I am the one who can tell you that further discussion will have no practical effect. You are welcome to continue to expound on the virtues of "format=flowed" (even if it is off-topic here). When you do so, however, it will be merely a theoretical exercise since there will be no action taken here. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/