Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:17:11 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: higher-level IO very slow with cygwin1.dll 5.10 (due to set_flags?) Message-ID: <20040628031711.GA17390@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20040626154504.GA961349@hpn5170x> <20040626160554.GA980221@hpn5170x> <20040626170940.GD20063@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20040626174145.GA1032441@hpn5170x> <20040627194205.GA10371@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20040627212949.GA176017@Worldnet> <20040627234350.GA13744@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 11:52:29PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: >On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:29:50PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >>>Your change makes getc work almost as fast a getc_unlocked. >>>This is on Win98. Yesterday's results were on WinME, where the >>>differences were larger. That hard drive died this morning :( >> >>Sorry to hear that. I've been going through hard disk problems >>myself. > >Is Cygwin killing hard drives ? In my case, the hard drive has never seen cygwin, even the cygwin source code, so if it is, it would be action at a distance. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/