Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: Annoucement: GCC-3.4.0 binary release candidat Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:50:27 +1000 Message-ID: <8ED2FA87C8ACC04192709688DDFD5F5F436258@calttsv025.cal.riotinto.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2004 23:50:28.0503 (UTC) FILETIME=[5EE0FA70:01C4526A] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id i5ENpRpe012873 >From: Gerrit P. Haase > > Hi David, > >> I'm more curious to know how others managed to build gfortran of 3.5. >> >> Tim Prince > > I am trying to get my mainline gcc builds restarted. I managed a build > overnight, including gfortran. I am unaware of any magic. > >Interesting, should I include gfortran into the distribution? What do >you think? Not yet. We will have to when 3.5.0 is released, as g77 can not build with the mainline gcc. > I was able to build the whole GCC suite including Pascal, Modula 2, D > and also Java without problems now, after I downgraded to cygwin-1.5.9. > Which version of cygwin did you use to build Java? I'm asking since > the Java build fails for me with cygwin-1.5.10-3 and one newer snapshot I > tried. Haven't built java/libgcj for a while. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/