Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 23:10:22 +0200 From: Baurjan Ismagulov To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: dll version collision Message-ID: <20040528211022.GB1325@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20040527212657.GC2617@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> <7F99F48A-B0C5-11D8-BB92-000A95C4BF56@cipheroptics.com> <20040528171500.GC26698@coe.bosbc.com> <20040528190550.GB5391@coe.bosbc.com> <20040528194634.GA1325@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> <20040528195809.GA6108@coe.bosbc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040528195809.GA6108@coe.bosbc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-IsSubscribed: yes On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:58:09PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > UML is not linux. It is a mechanism for running linux in userspace. Well, the point was that it can be used for testing. I haven't said it was linux, although for me it more or less is, as long as my kernel module or application has the necessary API and run-time environment. But I think you see what I mean, this goes OT. > I thought from this discussion that no one has the technical skills or > time necessary to use the facilities that are already part of cygwin. > Asking whether we would accept patches seems either rhetorical or at > least premature. This is good news :) . Your words in the previous posting sounded so stark and express that I wanted to eliminate the possibilities that: 1) there is something fundamentally bad in that idea; 2) the code would definitely have to be maintained separately. With kind regards, Baurjan. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/