Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Reply-To: Cygwin List Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.0.20040521150946.03262f68@pop.theworld.com> X-Sender: Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 15:10:41 -0400 To: "Dave Korn" , From: Larry Hall Subject: RE: where is at at? In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 01:50 PM 5/21/2004, you wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Igor Pechtchanski >> Sent: 21 May 2004 18:10 > >> On Fri, 21 May 2004, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >> >> > Dave Korn wrote: >> > >> > > Yes, there's also a Posix AT command: >> > > >> > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/at.html >> > > >> > > It interacts with the cron daemon. So in principle >> there's no reason >> > > why there shouldn't be a cygwin at command to interact >> with the cygwin >> > > crond entirely independently of the 'doze at command and task >> > > scheduler. I guess nobody's ported it yet. >> > >> > Let us know when you are finished porting it! ;-) >> >> :-) "Have I phrased it sufficiently neutrally to avoid being >> asked for a >> patch?" (C) Randall R. Schulz > > If it's now getting so that even *answering* a question rather than asking >one makes you liable for sending a patch, I think it's starting to get >_really_ mean around here! True. Please submit a patch with your intended changes. ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/