Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Reply-To: Cygwin List Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.0.20040503115531.030994f0@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 11:57:37 -0400 To: "electa" , cygwin@cygwin.com From: Larry Hall Subject: Re: are rand48() & Co implemented now? In-Reply-To: References: <20040503135454.GH2201@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 10:41 AM 5/3/2004, you wrote: >i have used >#include >but gcc still prints >"implicit declaration of function lrand48()", >and "srand48()". Sorry, I can't reproduce that behavior. See: >Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html The information requested at the URL above plus sample source should help clarify where your problem is. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/