Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: "Alex Vinokur" <alexvn@connect.to>
Subject: Re: Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers (including gcc cygming special)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:32:06 +0300
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <c5hf7n$i5l$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <c5gkcl$m1c$1@sea.gmane.org> <407C0198.4000707@cs.york.ac.uk> <c5hb1i$3ku$1@sea.gmane.org>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-166-121-61.barak.net.il
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106


"Alex Vinokur" wrote in message news:c5hb1i$3ku$1@sea.gmane.org...
>
> "chris" wrote in message news:407C0198.4000707@cs.york.ac.uk...
> > Alex Vinokur wrote:
> >
> > >        ========================================
> > >        Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers
> > >        C/C++ Performance Tests
> > >        =========================================
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > <snip>
> >
> > While this is quite interesting, it seems to me you aren't really
> > running these programs for long enough for us to be able to see what
> > differences are due to startup time and due to runtime.
>
> How can we know how long the startup time is?

In other words, what is the difference between startup time and runtime?
What takes (doesn't take) place in startup time?

[snip]


--
   Alex Vinokur
     mailto:alexvn@connect.to
     http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html






--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/