Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <407C0198.4000707@cs.york.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:04:56 +0100
From: chris <caj@cs.york.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alex Vinokur <alexvn@connect.to>
CC: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers (including gcc cygming special)
References: <c5gkcl$m1c$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <c5gkcl$m1c$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Alex Vinokur wrote:

>        ========================================
>        Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers
>        C/C++ Performance Tests
>        =========================================
>
>  
>
<snip>

While this is quite interesting, it seems to me you aren't really 
running these programs for long enough for us to be able to see what 
differences are due to startup time and due to runtime. How about a 
couple of extra jobs, one of which runs for 1 minute and one for 2?



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/