Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:52:06 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Definitely no sshd on FAT32? Message-ID: <20040324095206.GB24059@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <40608855.8080605@ianbrandt.com> <40609FD8.5030103@ianbrandt.com> <20040323215100.GY17229@cygbert.vinschen.de> <4060BDC0.8070009@ianbrandt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4060BDC0.8070009@ianbrandt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i On Mar 23 17:44, Ian Brandt wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >The following checks are performed on the key file in the following order: > > > >- Not Windows NT? Yes -> Don't check permissions. > > I'm running Windows 2000, so this shouldn't catch. > > >- "ntea" switched on? Yes -> Check permissions. (Not applicable on FAT32) > > I don't have it set, and according to the docs it's off by default, and > I'm on FAT32 anyway. > > >- statfs(key_file) fails? Yes -> Check permissions. > > I'm not familiar with this one, but I found a man page for statfs on my > linux server. Unless FAT32 is represented by some cryptic name in the > following file types (MSDOS_SUPER_MAGIC perhaps?), I'm guessing statfs > fails on FAT32? Not by design. If it fails, it *might* be a bug in Cygwin. Running sshd under strace could give us a clue. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/