Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Analyze: Velop Mail Shield v0.0.3
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 18:05:23 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_L=2E_W=2E_Meunier?= <1@pervalidus.net>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.9-1
In-Reply-To: <20040319175342.69F3E400188@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0403201804250.256@pervalidus>
References: <20040319175342.69F3E400188@redhat.com>
X-Archive: encrypt
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:

$ cygcheck.exe -f /usr/lib/libiberty.a
binutils-20040312-1
cygwin-1.5.9-1

Since you maintain both, what's the consensus ?

-- 
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/