Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:33:48 -0600 From: Joshua Daniel Franklin To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: g++ 2.95.3 (FAQ alert) Message-ID: <20040317123348.A25076@ns1.iocc.com> References: <4055E1C9.30307@terra.es> <20040315171846.GA23668@redhat.com> <20040317114342.A23940@ns1.iocc.com> <20040317175645.GA8173@redhat.com> <20040317121430.A24666@ns1.iocc.com> <20040317182604.GA8621@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040317182604.GA8621@redhat.com>; from cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com on Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 01:26:04PM -0500 On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 01:26:04PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:14:30PM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:56:45PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:43:42AM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > >> >On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:18:46PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Luis Valent?n wrote: > >> >> >Where can I find the gcc-g++ 2.95.3 cygwin package ? > >> >> > >> >> Cygwin used to offer gcc 2.95 but it is no longer available. Possibly > >> >> it is available on old mirror out there somewhere but there is no > >> >> official support in cygwin. > >> >> > >> >> Joshua/David, is there any chance that we can get this info into the > >> >> FAQ? > >> > > >> >No. Definitely not. > >> > > >> >Please see > >> > >> ? This is a generic entry. Given the number of times this question has > >> been specifically asked, I was thinking it deserved a specific entry, say > >> in the TOC. > > > >Well, it has gcc-2.95 listed in the title: > > > >"Can I use Cygwin Setup to get old versions of packages (like gcc-2.95)?" > > Ah. I guess this must have been in my cache since when I looked at it, it said: > "Can I use Cygwin Setup to update a B18, B19, B20, B20.1 or CD-ROM (1.0) installation of > Cygwin?" Yeah, I figured that one was outdated enough to nuke. You may have actually looked at it before I updated it, since I sent the email before committing the faq_toc change. Since the alert was from a couple days ago, I didn't expect anyone to be watching immediately. :) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/