Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:30:43 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: read(): varblk tape records...(& Fix for : read())
Message-ID: <20040316163043.GA21715@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <Sea2-F47JsNgMIELTzh0003dce9@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Sea2-F47JsNgMIELTzh0003dce9@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam

On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:00:45PM +0000, Jason Winter wrote:
>><http://cygwin.com/ml/lists.html#rbl-sucks>
>
>Yep, there you go.

The unblocking information at that web page is also included in any
bounce message that you get if your email does not go through.

>>No.  The mailing list does not reject email that contains source code.
>
>That remark is relative to what's in the source code, and from my 
>experience - it does - and - that's using source code from cygwin itself.  
>No.  I don't want to argue the point.

If you don't want to argue the point then don't make the point.

Let me say it again -- no mailing list on sources.redhat.com rejects
source code.  There is a huge traffic in sending source code to mailing
lists at this site.  There is, however, a spam blocker in operation.  If
it rejects a message due to a false positive, it is trivially easy to
bypass that block.  That does not, of course, stop people from failing
to read the instructions on how to unblock themselves and/or being
mortally offended by the block.

>>>Some programs fail because they expect the BOT signal to disappear.
>>Cygwin programs?
>
>You should know better than to ask such a question! It would be more
>likey a Linux program (which it is - but converted to use fixed blocks,
>not variable blocks.)
>
>Thanks and regards,

Fascinating.  You tell someone who is trying to help resolve your
problem that they should "know better" and then send "thanks and
regards".
--
Christopher Faylor
Cygwin Project Leader
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

