Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:49:45 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: latest snapshot seems better wrt make -j hang problems
Message-ID: <20040314034945.GA5250@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20040313171440.GA7326@redhat.com> <4053D28D.9000809@scytek.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4053D28D.9000809@scytek.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 10:33:33PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I have been running the "make -j" cygwin breaker for about ten hours now
>>with no hangs, no segvs, and no strange error exits.
>Me too :-D  it runs without error for 10h with 3300 iterations now.

I've been running for more than 24 hours now with no problems.  But,
this isn't the first time I could claim that so it may not prove
anything.

>>I'm sure this is just because of the magical way in which I have my
>>system set up but could anyone confirm or deny whether that this
>>snapshot behaves better?
>It is definitely better than all snapshots since 1.5.7, thanks!

I think I'll just package this up and ship it, then.  It's certainly
an improvement even if it isn't perfect.

Thanks for the feedback.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/