Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040302193614.01eec5f0@imap.myrealbox.com> X-Sender: tprince@imap.myrealbox.com Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:39:15 -0800 To: Erick Castillo , cygwin@cygwin.com From: Tim Prince Subject: Re: gcc 2.95_ In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-IsSubscribed: yes At 02:58 PM 3/2/2004, Erick Castillo wrote: >You're absolutely right, gcc version 3.3 does work fine. The problem I'm >having >is specific to the software I am trying to compile. The application i have >compiles with older versions of the compiler and this is why I'm looking for >older ones. So one last question... did v2.96 meet the same fate as v2.95? > No, gcc-2.96 was a red hat release, not a gnu release. I never saw it appear on cygwin, nor any OS other than those put out by Red Hat. Some of the versions were mighty buggy. Tim Prince -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/