Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:28:16 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: 20040217 snapshot problem Message-ID: <20040219052816.GB11421@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:23:02AM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote: >> Is this a regression from 20040216 or some other snapshot? > >Unless there are earlier post 1.5.7-1 snapshots than 20040205, no. > >I just ran through the 20040205-20040216 snapshots: > >20040216 - same result as 20040217 >20040215 - exception violation at x00000005 or similar. affects all cygwin programs, not > just XWin.exe >20040214 - same result as 20040217 >20040213 - same result as 20040217 >20040206 - same result as 20040217 >20040205 - same result as 20040217 There are some changes in the latest snapshot that may make inetd work better. I tracked down a stupid error that I'd introduced after 1.5.7. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/