Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: "utomo" <utomo@hotbox.ru>
To: "'Cygwin List'" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: Cygwin Mailing list
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:19:11 +0700
Message-ID: <004101c3f50d$329dd3d0$0501a8c0@windows>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20040216224145.039213a0@127.0.0.1>

Hi Larry, 

OK if like that It will no use to discuss about this further. Better to
discuss about better cygwin/less bugs :) 
I will stop this thread. 
Thanks.

Regards,

Utomo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Hall [mailto:cygwin-lh@cygwin.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:52 AM
> To: utomo; 'Cygwin List'
> Subject: RE: Cygwin Mailing list
> 
> 
> Hi Utomo,
> 
> Actually, this and many other arguments have already been 
> made and refuted 
> in previous rounds of discussion on this subject.  I think 
> everyone here would appreciate it if you would review the old 
> threads so that you don't rehash the same issues.  What other 
> lists do is not important.  There's no benefit to adding tags 
> to the subject line.  It won't be done here.  If there's a 
> good reason for continuing this thread, I'm at a loss to see it.
> 
> Larry
> 
> 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/