Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:14:00 -0800 (PST) From: "Peter A. Castro" To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Unix pipes implemented successfully In-Reply-To: <20040111200858.GA18960@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <55216.212.0.200.4.1073846861.mtc@mail.moldtelecom.md> <6.0.1.1.0.20040111140418.037e01f8@127.0.0.1> <55258.212.0.200.4.1073851049.mtc@mail.moldtelecom.md> <20040111200858.GA18960@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:57:29PM +0200, linamat@moldtelecom.md wrote: > >>Sorry, but no. The CVS version of cygwin already has a stub of a fifo > >>implementation and the device/fhandler stuff is much different than > >>1.5.5. > > > >But if I change the patch to be compliant with last CVS, should you change > >the answer? > > Sorry but it's unlikely. As I said, there is already a start of an > implementation for this which I am unlikely to want to throw out. > > I expect to have a working fifo implementation in a couple of releases. > It's the next thing I'll work on after fixing the signal/thread problems > in the current CVS. "in a couple of releases"? Oh, come on, Chris, have a heart for once. Couldn't you at least look at what he's done? You've just barely started while he's actually got something working. -- Peter A. Castro or "Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/