Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:14:21 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Oh dear, pthreads and stdio still not mt-safe :-(
Message-ID: <20040107181421.GD14105@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <NUTMEGOngNqOwUx9Etk000000db@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <NUTMEGOngNqOwUx9Etk000000db@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:47:31PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>Hi everyone (and Arash in particular!),
>
>Re: my earlier message [at
>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg00072.html ]
>
>  Well, I thought the latest snapshot had solved my problem with stdio
>getting messed up by threads, but there's still a bug in there somewhere.

We are missing a pthreads maintainer at the moment so it isn't likely that
this will be fixed anytime soon.

FYI,
cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

