Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Shankar Unni <shankarunni@netscape.net>
Subject: Re: Unable to compile cygwin
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 11:15:34 -0800
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <bs7ft7$s4$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <BCELLMLNMKLBEEMIBLGDEEOOCHAA.gabriel.soubies@thales-is.com> <20031222164832.GC2545@redhat.com> <bs7c1p$ob0$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
In-Reply-To: <bs7c1p$ob0$1@sea.gmane.org>

Jim Ramsay wrote:

> Ha!  Ask that boss to prove to you that there is no security problem 
> running Windows on a 'secure' network.

To a person with that mentality, Bill Gates is implicitly trustworthy 
(i.e. if he says it's true, it must be true by definition, because it's 
a "big company that stands by its products"), while anything Open Source 
is written by h4x0rs and thus must "prove its trustworthiness".

How, you ask them? They don't know, but you'd better "know".  No point 
arguing with them..



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

