Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:04:14 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: vtable with snapshot >=20031123 Message-ID: <20031215210413.GA26554@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <3FDA6322.3060100@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FDA6322.3060100@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Note-from-DJ: This may be spam On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 06:53:54PM -0600, Axel Naumann wrote: >Hi, > >I ran into a problem with gcc 3.3.1, cygwin snapshots>=20031123 (at >least, probably also earlier versions). Like 1.5.5, for instance. This isn't specifically a cygwin snapshot issue. >This did not happen with earlier versions of cygwin (1.4*); as far as I >can remember even gcc 3.3.1 with cygwin 1.4* worked. This is why I >believe it's a cygwin problem, not a gcc problem - but I'm really just >guessing. 1) There was no cygwin 1.4*. 2) gcc 3.3.1 was released after cygwin 1.5.x. -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam@sourceware.org and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/