Subject: Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <[email-masked]>
To: Lapo Luchini <[email-masked]>
Cc: CygWin <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:58:45 +0100

Hello Lapo,

Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 4:18:00 PM, you wrote:

> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

>>Interesting, it is really a little faster when libstdc++ is directly
>>compared with the STLport library.  So it would make sense to use it when
>>performance is an issue.
>>  
>>
> I guess it is smaller, too, the stdlibc++ not being shared.
> (or it is, now? I forgot to check before clicking "send" ;) )

Unfortunately the shared STLport library doesn't work, at least in this
case.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerrit 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/