Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 00:52:44 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_getline' Message-ID: <20031024045244.GB29905@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1D0130DE48@exchange.timesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1D0130DE48@exchange.timesys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 12:45:08AM -0400, Robb, Sam wrote: >>Yes - I found this almost immediately. My concern is that it *looks* >>like getline() is available, but it isn't. > >... and, it looks like the same situation for pread() in > >Grump. I suppose that in all of your searching you never came across the concept that cygwin uses newlib and that cygwin does not export every single thing from newlib? That means that there are some things defined in headers which are not actually available in cygwin. If you find that unconvincing, then yes. We'e just doing this because we don't like you and we're very mean. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/