Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:14:33 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: pwd option to return windows path
Message-ID: <20031022031433.GA12322@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20031022003445.GC1229@mdssirds.comp.pge.com> <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAzKqZwgE0Ekq6HjOKEbfGv8KAAAAQAAAA+mnXAThKBkSxz2muDS8sEQEAAAAA@acm.org> <20031022012824.GF1229@mdssirds.comp.pge.com> <20031022015145.GJ380@redhat.com> <20031022020853.GA1923@mdssirds.comp.pge.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031022020853.GA1923@mdssirds.comp.pge.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:08:53PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote:
>Personally, I think that gunter had the best option - if you don't like
>what I say, just - personally - direct me to /dev/null.  Problem
>solved.  If people think that I'm not 'on topic' I'll get ignored.

Sorry.  You don't get special treatment.

>And my guess is that you sure as hell aren't going to accept any
>patches that do what you - as I can see - find exceedingly distasteful,
>so what's the point in having the up-front aggravation?

Your guess, like many of your perceptions about cygwin and mingw is
flawed.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

