Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:56:49 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: results of compiling berkeleydb Message-ID: <20031013045649.GA15683@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20031013010344.GA18830@mdssirds.comp.pge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031013010344.GA18830@mdssirds.comp.pge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:03:44PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote: >Ok, I did as requested, and tried to compile berkeleydb with >-mno-cygwin. Results are below, along with some >thoughts/reflections.... Hint: GCC='gcc -mno-cygwin' ./configure. AFAICT, this won't get you a windows version of db with the unpatched sources (since it seems like you need to use a special windows configure script which defines DB_WIN32 to do that), but it should at least get you closer to that goal. The bottom line is that you were using the tools incorrectly. Didn't someone suggest doing more research before posting? Sounds like good advice to me. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/