Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 01:10:29 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: missing java headers Message-ID: <20031005051029.GA26312@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20030921000411.86E4632A822@redhat.com> <3F7E2B7A.2030804@kleckner.net> <20031004022816.GC9995@redhat.com> <3F7F8CEC.4000709@kleckner.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F7F8CEC.4000709@kleckner.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 08:15:56PM -0700, Jim Kleckner wrote: >I see. You only appeared to invite investigation. This gcc >announcement page that I referenced in my first email said nothing >about gcj or java problems. http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/changes.html I >did substantial searching, downloading and recompiling. But all you >can do is to write it off with a flip comment. > >These kinds of responses are very discouraging to people who want to >help. You seemed to be puzzled that java wasn't working. I pointed to the announcement that indicated the state of java. If you only read the latest announcement which indicated that it was a "very minor refresh" then you wouldn't have seen the above message. However, the "very minor refresh" phrase could have also triggered a "Hmm. I wonder what this is a minor refresh of" type of inquiry. I point these kind of things out so that, in the future, if you are researching problems like this, you will know where to search. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/