Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <3F7F8BE8.7070006@urth.org> Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 20:11:36 -0700 From: Terrence Brannon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin List Subject: emacs -nw control-c mapped to control-g References: <5.1.0.14.0.20030929173044.028c4240@127.0.0.1> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20030929173044.028c4240@127.0.0.1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit When I open emacs via "emacs -nw" in a cygwin bash shell, it maps control-c to control-g for some reason... I looked through the archive and this fine gentlemen's post: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-09/msg01647.html appears to have been ignored. Am I doomed to the same fate? Does the entire Cygwin team use vi??? :-) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/