Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 22:28:16 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc 3.3.3-1, gcc-mingw-20030911-2 missing java headers Message-ID: <20031004022816.GC9995@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20030921000411.86E4632A822@redhat.com> <3F7E2B7A.2030804@kleckner.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F7E2B7A.2030804@kleckner.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:07:54PM -0700, Jim Kleckner wrote: >Is it possible the java code simply wasn't configured to build? >All of the java headers are missing. > >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>I've moved all of the latest gcc stuff out of "test" and into "current". >>This is the standard gcc 3.3.1 release from gcc.gnu.org + patches from >>Danny Smith and (to a vastly lesser extent) me. If you are interested >>in checking these sources out of gcc's cvs repository, the branch tag is >>cygming331. But, please, no questions about where to go or how to do >>that on the cygwin list. Go to gcc.gnu.org for that kind of info. > >[snip] > >>There were vague reports of gcj being broken during the gcc test period >>but I never saw a true bug report for this. Since I'm not a java user, >>I can only provide this as-is. > > >Here are the things I looked at: So, you checked everything but the release announcement which said: "There were vague reports of gcj being broken during the gcc test period but I never saw a true bug report for this. Since I'm not a java user, I can only provide this as-is." -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/