Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <3F6F09C5.2030505@cs.york.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:40:05 +0100 From: chris User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special) References: <20030922115830.GL9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20030922115830.GL9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanner: exiscan *1A1Rqq-0004Ui-6u*qZaE8Pbv982* Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:36:32PM +0300, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > >>------ Cygwin ------ >>$ gcc foo.c -o foo1.exe >>$ gcc foo.c -mno-cygwin -o foo2.exe >> >>------ MinGW ------ >>$ gcc foo.c -o foo3.exe >> >>1. What is the difference between foo1.exe and foo2.exe? >>2. Is there any difference between foo2.exe and foo3.exe? >> >> > >Call cygcheck foo[123].exe. > > Just to add to this. For whatever reasons, I have found mingw executables to be slightly, but measurably faster (this was done some time ago). Also openGL applications seem to run much smoother under mingw than cygwin (could just be me / my very messed up computer tho) Although of course if you use mingw, you lose all of cygwin's emulatory features -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/