Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: "Alex Vinokur" <alexvn@connect.to>
Subject: Re: objdump : inaccurate demangling for foo(char* const)
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 09:17:42 +0300
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <bkgrek$eje$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <bkdtn1$597$2@sea.gmane.org> <bkfh75$v8o$1@sea.gmane.org>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106


"Rolf Campbell" <Endlisnis@mailc.net> wrote in message news:bkfh75$v8o$1@sea.gmane.org...
> foo(char* const) is no different from foo(char*), from the perspective
> of linking/overloading.
>
> Did you mean foo(char const *)?
>

I meant foo(char* const). not foo(char const *).
Thanks.

   =====================================
   Alex Vinokur
     mailto:alexvn@connect.to
     http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html
   =====================================




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/