Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <3F6427D1.1050400@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 04:33:21 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Available for testing: gcc-3.3.1-1 and gcc-mingw-20030911-1 References: <3F63F915.4090203@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20030914081450.27087.qmail@web21413.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030914081450.27087.qmail@web21413.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Danny Smith wrote: > Ada, Java, ObjC are affected as well as C++. Also, note that any C++ code > that uses iostreams or STL will be using exceptions. Oh yes, and new/delete use > exceptions. That is, any C++ code. 'Kay. > But garden variety C should not be affected. > Linking to w32api dll's certainly isn't affected. > > FWIW, C++ optimisation is so much better with gcc-3.3 than with 3.2 it would > probably pay to recompile C++ libs anyway, even if the exception model hadn't > changed That's fine by me (although Ralf will probably be a little torqued; qt & kde ...) -- I just wanted to know if I had to recompile all of my packages, which are mostly library-providers, AGAIN for the fourth time in less than a month. At which point it would've gotten ugly. But, it appears that I don't have to do that, except for ncurses (cygncurses++7.dll). So I'm happy... -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/