Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 14:04:47 -0400 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: latest cygcheck -c is expensive Message-ID: <20030905180446.GI1852@tishler.net> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20030905124047.GD1852@tishler.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Igor, On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:44:31AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > Problem reports will then have to include the output of "cygcheck > -scnver", but, IMO, this is worth the fine-grained control over what's > printed by cygcheck. > Opinions? The above sounds good to me. Thanks, Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/