Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <3F562E33.3080401@biosci.utexas.edu> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 13:08:51 -0500 From: james User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: DDD 3.3.5 success References: <20030903082916.83503.qmail@web13203.mail.yahoo.com> <20030903133447.GD9575@redhat.com> <001c01c37230$da38d460$6a567481@biosci.utexas.edu> <20030903174720.GA9457@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20030903174720.GA9457@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit i acknowledge you're right. i didn't know it until you mentioned insight when i asked about ddd. but ddd is not only a popular graphical front-end debugger, it's become the debugger of choice for many people, which is -- i daresay -- why the subject keeps coming up. Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:34:24AM -0500, james wrote: > > >>>The typical response to ddd problems is "Why not just use 'insight'?" >>> >>> >>that's kind of like saying, "why not just use windows?" i think it's fairly >>obvious that users would like to have the choice. >> >> > >Most of the time when people ask this question they don't even >know that a graphical debugger comes with the gdb distribution. > >-- >Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html >Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > > > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/