Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <3F562A2D.9040507@cs.york.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 18:51:41 +0100
From: chris <caj@cs.york.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: DDD 3.3.5 success
References: <20030903082916.83503.qmail@web13203.mail.yahoo.com> <20030903133447.GD9575@redhat.com> <001c01c37230$da38d460$6a567481@biosci.utexas.edu> <20030903174720.GA9457@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030903174720.GA9457@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christopher Faylor wrote:

>On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:34:24AM -0500, james wrote:
>  
>
>>>The typical response to ddd problems is "Why not just use 'insight'?"
>>>      
>>>
>>that's kind of like saying, "why not just use windows?" i think it's fairly
>>obvious that users would like to have the choice.
>>    
>>
>
>Most of the time when people ask this question they don't even
>know that a graphical debugger comes with the gdb distribution.
>  
>
Could I just add to this, I perfer ddd to insight by quite a lot, so 
that is why I would like ddd in cygwin :)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/