Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Shankar Unni Subject: Re: basename(), dirname(), what happened? Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 18:49:42 -0700 Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <181672454899.20030826123033@familiehaase.de> <20030829100633.GH614@emcb.co.uk> <126165476933.20030829122848@familiehaase.de> <20030829112004.GO614@emcb.co.uk> <20030901091036.GA22657@linux_rln.harvest> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (Compact) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20030901091036.GA22657@linux_rln.harvest> But all silliness aside, there's a very good point to the seeming extremes that the Cygwin project in particular, and the FSF in general, go in order to protect the code base by ensuring the true freedom of their sources. I give you the Linux mess, as exhibit #1. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/