Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:12:09 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: -x weirdness Message-ID: <20030819001209.GC1899@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <16193.14627.802702.855384@scicily.montreal.ad-opt.com> <197-1578450001.20030818232842@familiehaase.de> <16193.19010.57678.857942@scicily.montreal.ad-opt.com> <20030818221426.GA305621@Worldnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030818221426.GA305621@Worldnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 06:14:26PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 05:50:58PM -0400, Benoit Rochefort wrote: >> >> As pointed out, that doesn't explain the matter with >> /usr/bin/test which is also reporting /usr/bin/bash as >> beeing non-executable. >> >That's because /bin/test is still using stat() instead of access(). >Care to fix it? FWIW, the test version of sh-utils (the package that contains /bin/test) for cygwin 1.5.2 should now be using access(), not stat. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/