Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 14:13:58 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak Message-ID: <20030817181358.GE26741@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <3F30D849.8D2AA00C@itsec-ss.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 10:31:19AM +0300, Nedko Arnaudov wrote: >This is the proof. > >http://www.faultcentral.org/personal/nedko/soft/pootag.JPG >http://www.faultcentral.org/personal/nedko/soft/taskmanager.JPG These are two jpeg images with no words describing what we are supposed to be looking at. One display isn't even in English. I realize that English is probably not your first language but this is not proof of anything. It is puzzling that you feel the need to prove anything. Obviously people are having problems. That doesn't need to be proved. It also doesn't need to be proved that a simple unprivileged program run repeatedly should not be able to bring a modern operating system to its knees. Sorry, but what is needed is someone with an understanding of Windows to duplicate the problem and offer a realistic explanation. Posting images of meaningless data is not going to do that. -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam@sourceware.org and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/