Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ronald set sender to blytkerchan@users.sourceforge.net using -f Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:00:22 +0200 From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.5.1 libc.a link problem Message-ID: <20030807090022.GC20456@linux_rln.harvest> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20030805190957.GA2180@tishler.net> <20030805202015.GA7981@redhat.com> <20030806035851.GA3943@redhat.com> <20030806091015.GD15632@linux_rln.harvest> <20030806161421.GA13224@redhat.com> <20030806165350.GG18441@linux_rln.harvest> <20030806183942.GA16062@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030806183942.GA16062@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Disclaimer: I had nothing to do with it - I swear! X-loop: linux_rln.harvest On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:39:42PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:53:50PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:14:21PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> I assume that you must not have correctly replaced your copy of > >> /lib/libc.a: > >> > >> % ls -l libc.a > >> ls -l libc.a > >> -rwxrwxrwx 1 root cgf 741756 Aug 5 23:29 libc.a > >> % sum libc.a > >> 31407 725 > >> > >> cgf > >$ ls -l libc.a > >-rw-r--r-- 1 RLandhee Aucun 741756 Aug 6 05:29 libc.a > >$ sum libc.a > >31407 725 > > > >sorry, but it looks to me like it's the right one.. > >(timezone accounts for the difference in file date, I guess) > >I've put the results of the STC here if you want to check them out: > >eb97528e1c0f39b29e79e6a4998468ab *stc.tar.bz2 > >http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/stc.tar.bz2 > > > >cygcheck output is here: > >15b2c5971ad44d991496561272be6c0c *cygcheck.out > >http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/cygcheck.out > > Looking at the objdump from your test1.exe, it sure seems like you're > using an older version of libc.a. I'll see if there's any other libc.a lying around.. (..) yup - deleted it, tried again, works like a charm. Sorry - my fault. I'll go flock myself.. rlc -- Prepare for tomorrow -- get ready. -- Edith Keeler, "The City On the Edge of Forever", stardate unknown -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/